3 ms·
Why does it need to be innovative? Sounds like it's working as is. It's not clear that they're actually using radar to detect the birds for live monitoring. He
by phyzome 8y ago
Why does it need to be innovative? Sounds like it's working as is.
It's not clear that they're actually using radar to detect the birds for live monitoring. Here's what the article says:
« So, how to avoid disaster? New York City Audubon has positioned trained volunteers armed with binoculars on the roof of a parking garage in Battery Park City, at the base of the tribute, to monitor aggregations of birds in the tribute light beams. If densities exceed more than 1,000 birds or if a bird is found dead, the lights are shut down to allow the birds to disperse. »
- joewee 8y agoYou’re right, they aren’t using it in real time, they are using people looking up at the sky to make a gut determination as to when there are “too many” birds. I expected there to be innovation because based on the article, light pollution of this sort is a known issue for birds. Not ever source of this type of pollution will be able to have volunteers stand around looking at the sky. This seems like a problem that needs a automated solution to scale.
- dogecoinbase 8y agoThis seems like a problem that needs a automated solution to scale. How many more giant light beams are they planning on putting up?
- mirimir 8y agoThis is orders of magnitude more intense than typical light pollution.
- phyzome 8y agoYeah, I'd love to see a more general solution, but it turns out this is a very specific problem that doesn't relate all that well to the usual effects of city light on migrating creatures.