For anyone interested in the history of generative art and its parent discipline "(new) media art", some historical resources: - http://generative.net/read/hom

For anyone interested in the history of generative art and its parent discipline "(new) media art", some historical resources: - http://generative.net/read/home http://generative.net/read/home - http://www.medienkunstnetz.de/mediaartnet/ http://www.medienkunstnetz.de/mediaartnet/ - http://userwww.sfsu.edu/swilson/book/infoartsbook.html http://userwww.sfsu.edu/swilson/book/infoartsbook.html - http://archive.aec.at/ http://archive.aec.at/, and https://s3.amazonaws.com/arena-attachments/139740/8aec5cb9da76a6194bfc5184a427c5b3.pdf?1376461955 https://s3.amazonaws.com/arena-attachments/139740/8aec5cb9da... - http://dada.compart-bremen.de/ http://dada.compart-bremen.de/ - http://turbulence.org/ http://turbulence.org/ - http://neural.it/ http://neural.it/ (magazine) - http://rhizome.org/art/artbase/ http://rhizome.org/art/artbase/ - http://www.nettime.org/ http://www.nettime.org/ (classic net.art mailing list) - http://we-make-money-not-art.com/ http://we-make-money-not-art.com/ (previous-generation blog) - http://www.creativeapplications.net/ http://www.creativeapplications.net/ (current generation blog) Referring to Naon as a "prodigy" is a deeply out-of-context claim.