I agree with you on the accessibility angle, from the perspective of users with reading disabilities, color blindness, etc. I am not sure if that was the angle

I agree with you on the accessibility angle, from the perspective of users with reading disabilities, color blindness, etc. I am not sure if that was the angle you were aiming for. As for the accessibility of the ideas, they are presented clearly. Where jargon can't be avoided, it is presented by the role it plays, and a simple explanation of what it is not (see the digital signature panels) that presents an idea, gives the user enough information that they can start forming a question and addresses an incredibly common misconception. As for being in a minority, I don't know. What I do know is that as a person who has to deal with dyslexia on a daily basis in a largely text based position as a remote security engineer, I found this content to be very approachable, and it got positive feedback from several folks I shared it with this morning, including an early childhood educator and a retired teacher, so YMMV. As far as not being the target audience, frankly, I am squarely in the target audience as I am always looking for new and effective ways to teach people this stuff because as an infosec weenie a big chunk of my job is helping people avoiding the pitfalls of technology by helping others understand how to build secure or maintain basic opsec. This comic is not effective for me, since I am technical enough to need better resources, but it is super great for a project manager who might need to ramp up knowledge about why HTTPS or TLS is important without needed to know how to configure or implement it.