>while being effectively subsidized by the taxpayers roads, etc Every time someone wants to argue against anything involving a road, they pull out this "roads

>while being effectively subsidized by the taxpayers roads, etc Every time someone wants to argue against anything involving a road, they pull out this "roads are subsidized" canard. The state actually recovers most of the costs through gas taxes, registration fees, insurance requirements, and tolls, all of which rideshare drivers (and therefore riders) pay for -- and don't forget the income tax. If someone's activities are costing the state money (which I doubt) the correct response is to tax them -- not ban what they're doing or introduce artificial limitations on supply.