2 ms·
The $1 million per km figure is of course complete rubbish. That's just the cost scientists have had to pay to fabricate it using the zero-g plane. There is no
by barbegal 8y ago
The $1 million per km figure is of course complete rubbish. That's just the cost scientists have had to pay to fabricate it using the zero-g plane. There is no commercial application where the demand is that high.
The best commercial application for this type of fibre is a transatlantic crossing. In these applications typically 4 to 8 fibres are used and the distance is 7000km so the total length of fibre is around 50000km. For this sort of application the fibre cost needs to come in at around the $100 million dollar mark which is just $2k per km. To create a single km of cable in ZBLAN you need about 300g of feed-stock. So the revenue per kg is around $6k. This is below the current cost of around $10k per kg cost of sending payloads to orbit.
- walrus01 8y agoThe cost of the raw ultra low loss single mode fiber (9/125 on a spool) for a transatlantic crossing is negligible, it's the cost of the cable when it's fully integrated as a cable with jacket, copper for repeater power, etc. And then the bulk of the cost is actually the massive engineering project that involves repeaters, possibly branching units, cable ships, ROVs, plows, divers, beach work, cable landing stations. I would guess that the fiber strands are way less than 2% of the total capex spent.