3 ms·
Yeah, I skipped over a lot of the details, but you would need someone to choose to be a "host" (at least in terms of a "host" for the connection signaling stuff
by Klathmon 8y ago
Yeah, I skipped over a lot of the details, but you would need someone to choose to be a "host" (at least in terms of a "host" for the connection signaling stuff), but you can also implicitly make it the person who created the link safely.
- derefr 8y agoIf everybody is behind NATs (without uPnP privileges), nobody can be the "host" for connection-signalling purposes.
- Klathmon 8y agoThere are public ICE/STUN servers that can facilitate NAT-punching, google even hosts one. But that's not the aspect that I thought the root comment was talking about, but more the aspect of "A is hosting a room called 'stuff', and B and C want to browse the list of rooms and connect to it".