4 ms·
i get the feeling that an important concern that prevents soap adoption is the bulkiness of the xml standard that it's based on. i hope that the efficient xml i
by plq 16y ago
i get the feeling that an important concern that prevents soap adoption is the bulkiness of the xml standard that it's based on. i hope that the efficient xml interchange standard will make that concern go away that.
solutions like thrift seem to reinvent most of what's been done with xml schemas and other standards around soap solely on the grounds of performance.
oh and it's surprising that json-rpc is not in this pie-chart. pure rest is not powerful enough to communicate a complex object structure.
- tptacek 16y agoSeriously? You hope that SOAP survives, and switches from XML to binary XML? I'm already gearing up to send cyborgs back in time to kill the EXI team members on the off chance that standard takes off.
- plq 16y agoum, yes? the way i see it exi is to reduce the time to parse xml. but i'm not terribly familiar with exi standard (draft) and would like to know what's so terribly wrong with it. so, care to elaborate?