4 ms·
China is a nation. The particular instance of the law is designed to help (non-public important) individuals. Various companies that built fortunes on easily c
by quickben 8y ago
China is a nation. The particular instance of the law is designed to help (non-public important) individuals.
Various companies that built fortunes on easily collectible data, argue against the law with the "limiting free speech" line because they don't want to spend money on the data cleanup side.
The rest is propaganda.
- SilasX 8y agoAnd dismissing concerns about "memory hole"ing, by pandering to hatred of rich companies, isn't propaganda?
- quickben 8y agoThe NGO in question has a budget of 7 million pounds a year employing over 100 people to do, in their words: lobbying. The actually law was put in place by representatives of the voting majority of EU.
- SilasX 8y agoYes, you can inflammatorily impugn the motives of people arguing in favor of any side. That doesn't make the concerns about free speech invalid, it just means you're willing to resort to similar propagandistic tactics. Edit: rewrite after understanding your point better.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]