Dictators don't have all the annoying paper work of democracies so they are a lot faster and more focused, handy if you live in a developing nation. Generally t

Dictators don't have all the annoying paper work of democracies so they are a lot faster and more focused, handy if you live in a developing nation. Generally they are focused on getting the dictator all the things they want. Often the dictator wastes money on nice cars sure, but they also spend money on roads to drive them. Bad leadership is often better than none, especially when the dictator wants things that benefit everyone like food and electricity. We think of dictators as one person vs a nation but the many will always win that fight, the many allow them selves to be ruled as they think its in their interest, some times it is. I live in the uk which is ruled by the dictator the queen of England, technically she can overthrow parliament and in the past when parliament have been seen as corrupt this has happened. Is a dictator removing a corrupt parliament a good thing? or a bad sign the dictator is corrupt?