4 ms·

If automation is being used, the amount of objects being dealt with is probably minimal to begin with. One thing that is overlooked is that it isn't just a lea

If automation is being used, the amount of objects being dealt with is probably minimal to begin with. One thing that is overlooked is that it isn't just a learning advantage that people have over a robotic arm, there is way more input as well. We have sensitivity to pressure, weight and sound - even so people don't generalize lots of physical objects from only a few examples either.

YeGoblynQueenne 8y ago
>> We have sensitivity to pressure, weight and sound - even so people don't generalize lots of physical objects from only a few examples either. I dare say we do. For example, once a toddler has figured out how to grasp and manipulate objects, he or she can subsequently grasp and manpiulate any object that they are physically able to grasp and manipulate, regardless of shape, colour, size, texture etc. For example, if I know how to grab a Barbie doll, I know how to grab a Teddy bear, a firetruck, my mother's skirt, a spoon, etc, etc with the same level of skill. I must be misunderstanding your comment because this ability to generalise from even a single example is a hallmark of human intelligence and an especially striking example of its differences to machine learning systems.