4 ms·
Jekyll has been working well for me. I have around 190 public posts, dozens of pages and 50+ drafts on my site. With Jekyll-Assets I work with SCSS and everyth
by nickjj 8y ago
Jekyll has been working well for me. I have around 190 public posts, dozens of pages and 50+ drafts on my site.
With Jekyll-Assets I work with SCSS and everything becomes minified, along with getting md5 tagged file names for cache busting with no effort to set up.
When writing a blog post it takes around 2 seconds for live reload to kick in and refresh the post (which works nicely as a near real-time preview when writing). A full site build takes around 10 seconds but I only do this when deploying so it doesn't matter that it takes so long.
The only thing that sucks is for whatever reason I cannot get Jekyll to work at all with Docker for Windows which ultimately may end up convincing me to move to a different generator in the next iteration of my site. The devs don't seem to want to address the issue.