Sounds like the sort of thing GDPR's regulations of automated decision making is intended to deal with: https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-the-genera

Sounds like the sort of thing GDPR's regulations of automated decision making is intended to deal with: https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-the-general-data-protection-regulation-gdpr/individual-rights/rights-related-to-automated-decision-making-including-profiling/ https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-the-general-da... Specifically, even if you're allowed by Article 22 to perform automated decision-making (and decisions on bail that are mandated by law, as in the case at hand, would be allowed) must still: * provide meaningful information about the logic involved in the decision-making process, as well as the significance and the envisaged consequences for the individual; * use appropriate mathematical or statistical procedures; ensure that individuals can: * obtain human intervention; * express their point of view; and * obtain an explanation of the decision and challenge it;