3 ms·
https://twitter.com/mcannonbrookes/status/1039095041371697157 https://twitter.com/mcannonbrookes/status/103909504137169715... For what it's worth, our CEO has
by jjcm 8y ago
https://twitter.com/mcannonbrookes/status/1039095041371697157 https://twitter.com/mcannonbrookes/status/103909504137169715...
For what it's worth, our CEO has been outspoken against this.
This isn't a, "we're doing this because our company is for the bill" type of thing. It's a "we're doing this because me and my buddies who are working late tonight found out about this so we drafted up a letter to the government". I just don't want to say that I'm representing Atlassian's stance without running things through legal.
- lugg 8y agoI suspected as much, I just felt that if it was a stance worth making it was probably a stance worth running past legal (even if it meant a quick phone call out of hours.) Whether that call is met with abstantiation or otherwise is what I was wanting to infer. Because at this point, abstantiation or sitting on the fence is as good as supporting the bill.