2 ms·
> Meanwhile, your peers who went to medicine, finance, or business would be seeing a steady rise that routinely soared far above $200k, especially if they were
by toomanybeersies 8y ago
> Meanwhile, your peers who went to medicine, finance, or business would be seeing a steady rise that routinely soared far above $200k, especially if they were successful.
I've always considered my peers to be physical engineers (e.g. civil, mechanical, electrical), not finance or medicine people. I get paid a good amount more than my mechanical and electrical engineering friends, for a job that (for me) is easier and also took me 1 less year at university so I have a lower student loan and an extra year of earnings and experience (3 year B.Sc, vs 4 year B.Eng).
In terms of absolute numbers, I'd guess that there are actually a lot less people who got a B.Com in finance or business who are earning more than what software engineers earn. Most people who get a degree in finance don't end up working in finance, at least that's the case in Australia and New Zealand from the people I know.
- dunpeal 8y ago> I've always considered my peers to be physical engineers (e.g. civil, mechanical, electrical), not finance or medicine people. The key question is what profession has a name that rings similar, but what are your other options as a fairly clever person with a quantitative streak. In the US, finance is an obvious example. > Most people who get a degree in finance don't end up working in finance, at least that's the case in Australia and New Zealand from the people I know. I'm not an expert on OZ/NZ, but guessing that's because the financial sector in the US is several orders of magnitude larger.