3 ms·
Things aren't "going to collapse", anymore than things are "not going to collapse". From any given point point in time, there are multiple possible futures. Som
by nkoren 8y ago
Things aren't "going to collapse", anymore than things are "not going to collapse". From any given point point in time, there are multiple possible futures. Some of them may be tremendously dire, others tremendously positive. And there is a lot that you can do to influence which future you end up in.
Prepping to ride it out is a fool's game. I mean, sure, stock up your cupboards, get a couple weeks worth of bottled water, etc. Learn how to sew. That sort of stuff is never a bad idea. But if things go really pear-shaped, the main thing that'll get you through it other people. I've seen too many "preppers" stockpiling ammunition while burning their social capital. Idiots. They should be learning to rely on others, and be relied on by others. That's how you survive the bad futures. (That and a lot of luck).
Voting is somewhere something like the second least useful thing you can do. I mean, sure, do that too -- but it's kind of like steering a ship through choppy waters when you're only allowed to put your hand on the rudder once every couple of years. Certainly you should still do so, given the chance, but don't kid yourself about the efficacy or utility of voting.
What else can you do?
- Run for office.
- Speak at public meetings.
- Lobby your representatives.
- Provide financial, material, and moral support for others who do so.
- Educate your friends, family, and neighbours.
- Go out of your comfort zone and filter bubble. Learn from what's going on there. Help them understand you.
- Get a job that builds the kind of infrastructure that makes the good scenarios more likely.
- If your job is actively pushing the world towards the bad scenarios, then quit it. Or sabotage it.
- Protest. Civil disobedience.
There's a LOT you can do in addition to voting.
- jm__87 8y agoMost people don't have the time, energy or will to do most of these things. Many others who do would simply be very unhappy doing those things. My whole point was that people should just try to enjoy their lives, not have it revolve around some very low probability event.
- ace_of_spades 8y agoJust as an counter example to your reasoning... there are actually whole movements of people focusing on dangerous low probability events to increase the odds of good worlds coming out of them. Given very real prospects like dangerous races towards AGI or pandemics in the future, it seems like a very bad strategy to advocate for the status quo of not caring. If you are not willing to do anything yourself look at the possibility of donating. That does not disturb your world too much but actually makes a difference. I would love to see comments like yours point out this possibility more prominently as we would all be better for it, you too :) For more concrete insights regarding the role that everyone can play have a look at: www.80000hours.org or more generally at www.effectivealtruism.org