4 ms·

There is no way to read "no" from the opinion written by Kavanaugh, as it exclusively references standing precedent. As far as I'm aware, Kavanaugh has not deli

There is no way to read "no" from the opinion written by Kavanaugh, as it exclusively references standing precedent. As far as I'm aware, Kavanaugh has not delivered any opinions of his own that would suggest he is hostile to 4th amendment protections. Given his reputation as strong constitutionalist, I think if you want to make that accusation, then you should have something more than a simple interpretation of Supreme Court case law.

charleslmunger 8y ago
This article [1], from a source that is generally quite positive on Kavanaugh, provides much more evidence of a trend in Kavanaugh's interpretation of the 4th amendment from his previous cases. That's what originally informed my opinion. [1] https://reason.com/archives/2018/07/18/brett-kavanaughs-fourth-amendment-blind https://reason.com/archives/2018/07/18/brett-kavanaughs-four...