Remembering exactly this I went and found the paper and looked and the sample sizes aren't that small, I couldn't see any missing comparisons, and the relevant

Remembering exactly this I went and found the paper and looked and the sample sizes aren't that small, I couldn't see any missing comparisons, and the relevant P values are less than 0.01 so not obviously super P-hacked. On the other hand it is a priming study that would probably not have been published if the result went the other way, and it's a newsworthy result. All indicators of non-replication. I got 88% accuracy on the replication quiz and if this was on the quiz I would have marked it as unsure. I don't think it's obviously bogus, but also I'm not totally convinced.