5 ms·

> very similar to the Common Lisp one, arguably with some improvements Quite the opposite. Common Lisp macros are totally unrestricted, they don't auto-qualify

> very similar to the Common Lisp one, arguably with some improvements Quite the opposite. Common Lisp macros are totally unrestricted, they don't auto-qualify names with the package. Also, there are user-defined reader macros in CL, unlike Clojure.

drcode 8y ago
Well, auto-qualified names are a matter of taste. I agree 100% though that the CL reader macro system is a dream.