2 ms·
The variational representations used in image processing are much more complicated than you suggest. In many cases, they are developed with semantic models that
by mlthoughts2018 8y ago
The variational representations used in image processing are much more complicated than you suggest. In many cases, they are developed with semantic models that inform grammars of what the image can be composed of, and directly model things like occlusion, cusps, edges, blur, etc., when postulating a joint functional space that can describe the “energy” of an image, which then minimizing gives not only pixel values but also parametric curves for boundaries and sometimes also labels.
It’s essentially a way to encode semantics as prior distributions over possible images, then variational methods “optimize” for the posterior parameters given some data.
I’m trying to say that that whole exercise listed above, conceptually, is basically a failed idea compared with solving the same problems using deep learning to automatically discover what that manifold looks like in parameter space and transform it directly to the output space of practical interest (segmentation boundaries, etc.).
- ur-whale 8y ago>The variational representations used in image processing are much more complicated than you suggest Fair enough, but my main point stands: has anyone tried to apply Euler-Lagrange and a PDE solver to the problem of training a deep net or is it obvious that backprop-based methods will work better?
- enriquto 8y agonot exactly the same thing, but here you have a "Deep Neural Networks motivated by Partial Differential Equations", that may pique your interest https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.04272 https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.04272