>If he had disclosed all his conflicts, the same research would have been published in the same places with the same people. Nothing would have changed. Specul

>If he had disclosed all his conflicts, the same research would have been published in the same places with the same people. Nothing would have changed. Speculation. > Nobody really cares or pays much attention. Maybe they should. >When it comes to clinical trials, there are many checks and balances that prevent a 'rogue' conflicted investigator from influencing the results. And you think these checks and balances work good enough, most of the time?