3 ms·
For those who might not understand the context where this is happening: - Russian authorities plan to raise retirement age to 65 years, while the average life
by codedokode 8y ago
For those who might not understand the context where this is happening:
- Russian authorities plan to raise retirement age to 65 years, while the average life expectancy for men is 66.4 years. It means many people will pay pension tax for all their life and get almost nothing back. Navalny is planning large protest rallies against this and against Putin as well. They are unlikely to become big (judging by previous ones) - maybe some 20-40 000 people max but the government in Russia doesn't want to admit that there are people who are against it.
- Therefore, in most cities including Moscow rallies are not approved by local governments and will be considered illegal. It means participants will be arrested by the police and fined or get 10 to 30 days in prison (organisers can get up to additional 25 days).
- Also, on Sept. 9 there will be local elections in some regions and cities, but opposition candidates were not registered for them (this is one of the ways how Putin and his party wins elections - by allowing only weak candidates to take part in them). So September 9 is a perfect date for protests against this too.
- Opposition buys ads on Youtube to promote the rallies because most media are controlled by the government and only report how life will be better for seniors with new law and how everyone will win from it, and that most countries in Europe had raised retirement age too. So many people don't know about protests.
- Russian authorities sent a letter to Google demanding them to stop displaying ads because it is considered a political ads which is not allowed the day before elections (you cannot promote candidates the day before elections). But Youtube removed ads even in the regions where there are no elections.
- smsm42 8y ago> while the average life expectancy for men is 66.4 years This is however life expectancy at birth. I.e. if you're born today, in average, you'll live to 66.4 years. Comparing this figure to pension age is not very useful, since this figure is heavily influenced by infant mortality (and also by registration practices for live births), and infants do not contribute into the pension system and if somebody dies in infancy, it doesn't matter what the pension age is, they wouldn't have a chance to benefit from it. Properly estimating how the reform would influence people requires looking at life expectancies at more advanced ages - e.g. at 42 it's 27 years, and at 60 (current retirement age) it's 16 years. It's still a significant change, which people can be rightfully upset about, but making it sound like average person would just have little more than 1 year to live after 65 is wrong. More correct figure is almost 13 years. Sorry for somewhat offtopic comment, but using life expectancy at birth to make conclusions about people of advanced age is just wrong IMHO.