Interesting. I put more weight on the authors caveats about this method, than on the method itself, which is fine since it was I think just presented as an exa

Interesting. I put more weight on the authors caveats about this method, than on the method itself, which is fine since it was I think just presented as an example of what could be done. Also, if the person most likely (by this analysis) is actually the one who wrote the op-ed, it was either: - the POTUS, which seems unlikely (although who knows) - the secretary for the POTUS, who types his tweets as well - the one person in the President's circle who he cannot fire