You're assuming a whole host of things: 1. High growth creates durable wealth 2. Growth does not create waste 3. Trickle down economics 4. High growth doesn

You're assuming a whole host of things: 1. High growth creates durable wealth 2. Growth does not create waste 3. Trickle down economics 4. High growth doesn't create bust cycles 5. High growth doesn't ruin the environment I mean, I could go on--it is a complex topic, after all--but your comment wanted to reduce it down to some kind of richer/poorer dichotomy, which is obviously false. And it was snarky, which is annoying.