3 ms·
This is a one-sided story pushing a "Us vs Them" narrative. I can see nothing productive coming out of this.
by jonnybgood 8y ago
This is a one-sided story pushing a "Us vs Them" narrative. I can see nothing productive coming out of this.
- pelario 8y agoI'm not sure if this is pushing a "us vs them"; and yes, it obviously is a one-sided story. So, yes, I would really like to read a reply to this article but any of the other parties mentioned there.
- nervlord 8y agoofcourse not, it's not talking about anything you want to hear. If it was an article about something you cared about though, or that would offer some advancement of your pet cause, i'm quite sure you'd be out there with your placards and the silly chants
- dang 8y agoWe've banned this account for violating the site guidelines. If you don't want to be banned, you're welcome to email hn@ycombinator.com and give us reason to believe that you'll follow the rules in the future. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
- lolc 8y agoThe weird thing is that the paper was accepted at two journals. Which says something about it's quality. It doesn't mean the author is right! But at that point (if you assume scientifc honesty) you'd expect critics to distill their disagreements in a paper and publish that. That hasn't happened however. All that's happened has happened behind the scenes. Unless the article we read is dishonest in this regard.