5 ms·
The first android designs were more like Blackberry's than an iPhone[1]. The designs ended up being publicized during the Oracle trial. You can clearly see that
by minhazm 8y ago
The first android designs were more like Blackberry's than an iPhone[1]. The designs ended up being publicized during the Oracle trial. You can clearly see that they were no where near what Apple was doing with the iPhone. After Apple released the iPhone Google decided to not even release that version and decided to re-do the phone[2]. They believed that a touch screen can't completely replace physical buttons[3]. I'm always surprised how reluctant people are to give credit to Apple for completely changing the smartphone industry.
1. https://www.theverge.com/2012/4/25/2974676/this-was-the-original-google-phone-presented-in-2006 https://www.theverge.com/2012/4/25/2974676/this-was-the-orig...
2. https://www.pcworld.com/article/254539/original_android_prototype_revealed_during_google_oracle_trial.html https://www.pcworld.com/article/254539/original_android_prot...
3. https://www.theverge.com/2012/4/25/2974843/google-in-2007-a-touchscreen-cannot-completely-replace-physical/in/2731667 https://www.theverge.com/2012/4/25/2974843/google-in-2007-a-...
- euyyn 8y agoI have yet to find a single person that doesn't believe that Apple revolutionized the smartphone industry with the iPhone.
- parasubvert 8y agoAre you new around here? There’s a vocal set of diehard contrarians that insist LG was the true pioneer and Apple just has better marketing, the iPhone wasn’t a better product. It’s the most successful consumer electronics product in history, but some still are in denial.
- euyyn 8y ago7 years with an account, and a few before just lurking. This is the first time I hear that, so they must not be many, or not very vocal.