3 ms·
I find this phrase often gets over-applied to situations where people are actually attempting to do something about a problem they feel passionate about. To me
by murph-almighty 8y ago
I find this phrase often gets over-applied to situations where people are actually attempting to do something about a problem they feel passionate about.
To me, it's mostly straightforward: if you're actually following your words with meaningful action that could directly impact the problem, it's not virtue signalling.
Proposing meaningful gun regulation after a school shooting? Not virtue signalling. Offering thoughts and prayers and trying to put prayer back in schools? Virtue signal. That does nothing to resolve someone shooting people at a school.
It's also aggravating to see people start charities or donate their time and money towards a cause only to be accused of virtue signalling.
- ArchTypical 8y ago> if you're actually following your words with meaningful action that could directly impact the problem, it's not virtue signalling. Wouldn't the opposite be true? If you are doing it, you are signalling your actual virtue. If you not, it might not be, but that's missing the point. Signalling you support a philosophy by stating a related behavior is the whole point. Actually doing it or mentioning an intent, is functionally the same.