4 ms·

Thanks for all the feedback! I can address of few of these. 1. Threads should be sorted by date of most recent email, regardless of importance. This sounds lik

Thanks for all the feedback! I can address of few of these. 1. Threads should be sorted by date of most recent email, regardless of importance. This sounds like a real bug and I'll dig into it. 2. Yes, great feedback. You could archive it, does that work? 3. What's the use case? Why do you want to keep spam? You could forward it to yourself and it should work (a bit hacky, i admit) The last 3 are all not going to happen for a number of hard reasons, unfortunately.

mehrdadn 8y ago
Thanks for the reply! 1. Thanks! Let me know if you need additional info or can't repro, the last time this happened to me was a while ago (doesn't happen often since it requires subsequent emails to be far apart in time and categorized with different importance). EDIT: I just repro'd it again. The conversation ordering under the Important section is definitely based on the date of the last Important message rather than the date of the last message, so the conversation will fall out of the screen if the last important message in that conversation was a long time ago. 2. I use archiving for emails that I want records of, but that I don't want cluttering my inbox or appearing on my screen at all, unfortunately (like notifications about some activity on other sites). It's not the same thing as, say, a personal email or something from a mailing list that was unimportant but that should still get a little bit of eyeball time at some point. 3. There are a few use cases... sometimes I want to investigate why I got some spam after the 1-month period when it's deleted, meaning I want the message headers etc. to be there. Other times I want a filter that automatically keeps everything matching it because I might not be able to guarantee that I'll look into the spam folder every month, and I cannot risk losing some emails that way. (How do I respond when someone asks if I got their email and I don't have a copy to check?) I honestly think there's no compelling reason why whether or not an email is spam has to be tied to its lifetime. For undoing, any chance you could address why "View Message" couldn't just send the email right then? It's impossible to undo afterward, so delaying after it's clicked seems entirely counterproductive, right?

mehrdadn 8y ago

Thanks for the reply! 1. Thanks! Let me know if you need additional info or can't repro, the last time this happened to me was a while ago (doesn't happen often since it requires subsequent emails to be far apart in time and categorized with different importance). EDIT: I just repro'd it again. The conversation ordering under the Important section is definitely based on the date of the last Important message rather than the date of the last message, so the conversation will fall out of the screen if the last important message in that conversation was a long time ago. 2. I use archiving for emails that I want records of, but that I don't want cluttering my inbox or appearing on my screen at all, unfortunately (like notifications about some activity on other sites). It's not the same thing as, say, a personal email or something from a mailing list that was unimportant but that should still get a little bit of eyeball time at some point. 3. There are a few use cases... sometimes I want to investigate why I got some spam after the 1-month period when it's deleted, meaning I want the message headers etc. to be there. Other times I want a filter that automatically keeps everything matching it because I might not be able to guarantee that I'll look into the spam folder every month, and I cannot risk losing some emails that way. (How do I respond when someone asks if I got their email and I don't have a copy to check?) I honestly think there's no compelling reason why whether or not an email is spam has to be tied to its lifetime. For undoing, any chance you could address why "View Message" couldn't just send the email right then? It's impossible to undo afterward, so delaying after it's clicked seems entirely counterproductive, right?