> First off, the Article 13 in question was already rejected once by Parliament and is expected to be repealed against It was rejected rather narrowly (278-318

> First off, the Article 13 in question was already rejected once by Parliament and is expected to be repealed against It was rejected rather narrowly (278-318) a few months ago, and only because some of the coalition that voted against it wants to pass a slightly weaker version of the other clauses instead.