This is such bullshit. They call it a "trade off", but a trade off between what exactly? On the one side there's a non-trivial number of negative consequences t

This is such bullshit. They call it a "trade off", but a trade off between what exactly? On the one side there's a non-trivial number of negative consequences to this change, and on the other hand, the maintainer person literally is unable to give any other reason besides, "this isn't information that most users need to concern themselves with in most cases". No other reason given besides that very vague assumption about .. I'm not even sure, say if most users need not concern themselves with information that isn't there, does that mean they would otherwise be concerned about it? And what does that mean? And how is it bad? And why don't you just say so? I'm calling bullshit. If there is a reason why they decided this, it is not that. My bet it's something political.