4 ms·
> and this statement makes me sad and angry Your MAC and/or IP address should not identify you, and never should have been used as an identifier. It's the ide
by tenebrisalietum 8y ago
> and this statement makes me sad and angry
Your MAC and/or IP address should not identify you, and never should have been used as an identifier. It's the identity of a communication endpoint.
If the OSI model is about making the core of the network stupid and fast, which has proven benefits of scalability and/or extensibility, then identity/authentication is not the network layer's job and never was.
If a protocol assumes all hosts on a subnet are trustworthy (ARP/DHCP for example), it's an upper-level protocol design failure, not really having to do with transport (TCP/UDP)/network (IP) layers.
- tormeh 8y agoWe need some kind of DNS-style federated service that can map the identity (MAC address?) of a non-stationary device to its IP address.
- tenebrisalietum 8y agoThere's an elaborate protocol framework that does this for cellular data, I don't know much about it. There is also SCTP.