3 ms·
I'm actually pretty convinced. I think the Party is basically fairly smart, and they are extremely aware of the threats to their rule. For instance, after the
by pasabagi 8y ago
I'm actually pretty convinced. I think the Party is basically fairly smart, and they are extremely aware of the threats to their rule.
For instance, after the first gulf war, they started extensive military reforms, presumably seeing how Saddam's gigantic, tank-heavy, cold-war era army fared against new technology, and seeing that the same could happen to them.
I think time and time again, they've moved very fast to neutralize threats - and as I see it, there are few that would be more pressing than general disillusionment, the normalization of graft and cynicism. It's this culture that really killed the USSR.
When nobody believes in your system, it doesn't matter how absolute your power is, or how utterly defeated your enemies are. Everybody in your administration will be essentially working for themselves, and stealing everything that isn't bolted down.
- doombolt 8y agoI'm really unconvinced by Xi Jinping concentrating power. It does look like he desperately wants to be China's Putin (with the charisma of Medvedev), and there's nobody to stop him.
- pasabagi 8y agoYeah, that's probably a bad sign. That said, I don't think it's as fundamental a difference as a western perspective makes it out to be. Westerners are, for obvious reasons, terrified of charismatic leaders - but there are plenty of dictatorships that get along just fine with a bureacracy. Having an official great leader doesn't necessarily transform the power structure.
- doombolt 8y agoI don't think so. Leader for life == trouble.