> You would still need the compiler to be written in progsbase too: is it? Currently no, but the progsbase language is very simple and contains only well-known

> You would still need the compiler to be written in progsbase too: is it? Currently no, but the progsbase language is very simple and contains only well-known constructs. So creating a compiler is very simple, it would take only a few days. This is like the point you make about forth, except forth contains less well known constucts. > open source The progsbase specification is also open: https://docs.progsbase.com/ https://docs.progsbase.com/