4 ms·
> employers can't choose (freely) who to fire. It's first in last out, or if you want to sidestep that, you'll have to compensate the employee quite heavily Do
by everdev 8y ago
> employers can't choose (freely) who to fire. It's first in last out, or if you want to sidestep that, you'll have to compensate the employee quite heavily
Do you mean "lay off"? Employers should be able to fire anyone with cause regardless of when they were hired.
- alkonaut 8y agoSorry yes I mean "lay off" (edited). With cause obviously you can fire anyone.
- zero_intp 8y ago'layed off' means different things in the US versus Europe. In the US, an employer may 'lay off' as much staff as they want and then hire new people into those positions. In France, for example, a 'lay off' must close the position and not hire a new body into that role for 12-24 months. This may be difficult to prove, but the laws exist.
- OtterCoder 8y agoWow, I actually really like the French policy. It would make employers actually distinguish between a temp position and a full hire up front. Too many small businesses try to optimistically hire in good times, only to suddenly realize a few months later that they would collapse under the new payroll when business is normal.
- everdev 8y agoYes, and I've been "laid off" before after having compensation discussions with management. The employer dodges a lot of liability they would have if they fired me after asking for a pay raise. But for me the end result was I still lost my job. I like the 12-24 month waiting period as it would help reduce lay off abuse.