3 ms·
any evidence that it doesn't match with the top ~1M websites? because that page says "hashed versions" which kind of implies "not inspect-able". also why does
by Avshalom 8y ago
any evidence that it doesn't match with the top ~1M websites? because that page says "hashed versions" which kind of implies "not inspect-able".
also why does it collect client ID at all and also "should uniquely identify a client implementation, not an individual user" doesn't sound a lot like "can't identify an individual user" ... especially in a home user context.
- UncleMeat 8y agoGiven that the system makes a network request when a hashed match is found, anybody could verify this. Surely the evidence would need to go in the other direction, especially since revealing the offending websites would signal to malicious parties exactly what they need to change.