4 ms·
Well, of course, not having to deal with distributing and handling the firmware in your OS is a very nice bonus. However, I could have worded myself better: FSF
by seba_dos1 8y ago
Well, of course, not having to deal with distributing and handling the firmware in your OS is a very nice bonus. However, I could have worded myself better: FSF's RYF certification actually isn't about "downloadable firmwares", it's about "upgradable firmwares". IOW, if the user is able to install the software by themselves, the preinstalled one must be free, period - and no closed alternatives can be advertised or suggested. Redpine releasing a tool to flash the proprietary firmware would likely make the Librem 5's RYF certification void, which is a thing that IMO isn't helpful to anyone involved.
Openmoko already went through that route, although AFAIR there was no formal RYF programme yet back then. Freerunner was all fine from FSF PoV until Openmoko released a firmware upgrade for the Calypso baseband that fixed some ugly bugs, suddenly making it not free enough for FSF. Which is especially funny considering that it basically opened the way to run OsmocomBB on that thing.
- sounds 8y agoYeah, the Openmoko situation and OsmocomBB really highlights the nuances of the situation. I wish the FSF RYF requirements explicitly allowed a later release of a flash tool. (It seems like this only improves the user's freedom - suddenly you can treat your device as programmable, but only if you want to.) But I don't think people will be nearly as upset if the Librem 5's RYF certification becomes void later. I think the impact will still be large if it has RYF certification on launch.