You are correct. However, Twitter is not a govt with checks and balances for the purposes of accountability. It is a company and their judgement, like most co

You are correct. However, Twitter is not a govt with checks and balances for the purposes of accountability. It is a company and their judgement, like most companies, is part of the product. What transparency would you find acceptable? Do you hold other companies to that level? I dont know the books for my local grocery store, I dont know their justifications or reasonings for what they do or dont stock, when they decide to hire, or what rules they hire for. I'm not trying to be antagonistic or dismissive - I am far from an "anything goes" libertarian (or a libertarian of any kind) but if rules about rules are arbitrary, then we're just doing what we complain about.