4 ms·
If you care about usability this is clearly an improvement. The cost/benefit doesn't work out. It's a usability improvement, but it comes with a huge cost, whe
by stcredzero 8y ago
If you care about usability this is clearly an improvement.
The cost/benefit doesn't work out. It's a usability improvement, but it comes with a huge cost, where many, many sites have the fundamental function of a URL -- that of an address/specifier across the internet -- basically broken. The person who implemented this change either didn't work out the cost, or decided they didn't care.
Everyone is hyperventilating over contrived "the principle of it all" examples.
How would you feel if primary keys in your database started to change their semantics? How would you feel if your phone started to change the telephone number it dialed? I guess we're kind of alright with the message app editing our messages as we type them. Now we're supposed to adapt to our tools, not the other way around, and insisting on tools doing what we say is "pedantry."
- abalone 8y agoAgain you are shamelessly arguing "the principle of it all" without actual real world examples of problems.. Cite some real problems and we can have a more productive discussion. It doesn't help to falsely equate hiding "www." with corrupting phone numbers.
- stcredzero 8y agoCite some real problems and we can have a more productive discussion. Already cited elsewhere. It doesn't help to falsely equate hiding "www." with corrupting phone numbers. It's a valid comparison. Both are specifiers. It's the same sort of shenanigans with poorly planned "abbreviated" phone extension dialing and outside number prefixes in my company's office causing wrong numbers and accidental 911 dialing.
- jsjohnst 8y agoRead the linked bug report. Concrete examples were given. A super glaring one to me is that: m.tumblr.com IS NOT a mobile version of tumblr.com If I tried, I could likely come up with a ton more, but so could you if you tried.
- baby 8y agoYou are overestimating the cost. This is going to help kill the www on the long run.
- stcredzero 8y agoJust how much is www costing the world? I think compromising the function of URLs is going to be much more than whether or not there's a www in one.
- kowdermeister 8y ago> How would you feel if your phone started to change the telephone number it dialed? If they replaced the country code with a flag, that would be an improvement. If they replaced the carrier number with the logo of the company that's also not bad. These are UI changes and the one you proposed about the phone numbers are great :)
- stcredzero 8y agoIf they replaced the country code with a flag, that would be an improvement. If they replaced the carrier number with the logo of the company that's also not bad. These are UI changes and the one you proposed about the phone numbers are great :) If I were to propose a change, it would be 1-to-1. What happened in Chrome 69 isn't one to one. It's a surjection, which broke lots of URLs. That's the difference between a great UI change and an inconsiderate, idiotic one.