> of the road infrastructure here, bridge included, had been privatized That's not correct. They're not privately owned: they're a sort of lease (I can't quite

> of the road infrastructure here, bridge included, had been privatized That's not correct. They're not privately owned: they're a sort of lease (I can't quite translate "concessione") because the government is still technically the one who onws it. And for those other HN readers, there's also a public-owned company that handles roads, Anas, which is not doing well with regards to maintenance (this just to put into perspective that's not just a public vs private thing).