3 ms·
Compare yesterdays Ars Technica piece, https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2018/09/google-wants-to-get-rid-of-urls-but-doesnt-know-what-to-use-instead/ https://arst
by masswerk 8y ago
Compare yesterdays Ars Technica piece, https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2018/09/google-wants-to-get-rid-of-urls-but-doesnt-know-what-to-use-instead/ https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2018/09/google-wants-to-get-...
As a comment reads there, do they want to reintroduce AOL keywords?
Edit: May we expect a non-standard subdomain "google-remote", which is more of a protocol-extension and will be also hidden?
- Donzo 8y ago"Their complexity makes them a security hazard." GTFOH! HANDS OFF!
- masswerk 8y agoNotably, what is the common answer to a system regarded to be too complex to be handled on a general level, so that it may be considered a common risk? Authority (read, trusted man in the middle).
- akurtzhs 8y agoThey already reintroduced AOL keywords in 2011 with their Direct Connect "feature" for Google+, https://googleblog.blogspot.com/2011/11/google-pages-connect-with-all-things.html https://googleblog.blogspot.com/2011/11/google-pages-connect..., so one could go straight to Pepsi's Google+ page with +Pepsi. They killed it off in 2014.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]