The argument is basically just that the government is so terrible at actually reliably making good laws, and at avoiding terrible unintended long-term consequen

The argument is basically just that the government is so terrible at actually reliably making good laws, and at avoiding terrible unintended long-term consequences from even the best laws, and is so reliable about turning even the most well-intentioned and well-thought-out regulations into jumping-off precedent and justification for really bad ideas, that- -despite the fact that pure Internet anarchy is obviously not the optimal solution, or even a particularly good idea- -letting the government make well-intentioned and obviously-good laws about it is still worse.