3 ms·
Well, that's perhaps reductionist a bit too far to be a useful statement. There are other things outside the kernel that are important too, and design decisions
by xorcist 8y ago
Well, that's perhaps reductionist a bit too far to be a useful statement. There are other things outside the kernel that are important too, and design decisions that matter to user space.
Things like OLE can be said in retrospect wasn't a good idea security wise. Autorun kept delivering for more than a decade. Perhaps GDI could do with a security model. That sort of things makes it unnecessarily difficult to secure the system.
The reason we don't hear about Windows router botnets is because nobody bothers building those boxes in the first place. You put your Windows box behind a small Linux box in order to connect it to the Internet, not the other way around.
- ectospheno 8y agoQuite a few are placed behind small BSD boxes rather than Linux. But yeah, internet facing Windows routers aren't exactly common. Certainly not without spending a good bit of time in group policy editor turning off almost everything.
- jahewson 8y agoYep though there’s problems on the *nix side too, e.g. X11 does not have a great security model. But it’s also unlikely to be running on a router.