4 ms·
GIMP still lacks non-destructive editing, does it not? That alone is a huge deficiency in comparison to Photoshop.
by RankingMember 8y ago
GIMP still lacks non-destructive editing, does it not? That alone is a huge deficiency in comparison to Photoshop.
- acomjean 8y agoPhotoshop had non-destructive editing now? Its been a while ,but I thought that was lightroom that had the non-destructive editing features. Photoshop for me was about layers and masks
- tokyodude 8y agoPhotoshop had non-destructive editing for 15-20 years. I think the issues are getting confused. Yes, Lightroom saves a separate file from your photos of the changes so in that sense it's non destructive, the original files are not changed. Photoshop is non-destructive in that you can load an image into a layer and apply tons of layers above that layer each of which edits the layers below it in some way. The pixels in the image layer are never changed so it's also "non-destructive". But saving the file does overwrite the old photoshop file with your changes, unlike lightroom.