3 ms·
I have always had issues with justifications of moral systems containing the word 'evolutionary', especially when it comes to things like homophobia. First, be
by aluren 8y ago
I have always had issues with justifications of moral systems containing the word 'evolutionary', especially when it comes to things like homophobia.
First, because it sounds incredibly simplistic. Time after time new findings show that there's more to evolutionary processes than we thought, and there's more to the human brain than we thought, so imagine the sheer complexity of understanding both at the same time. It strikes me as suspcious, if not intellectually lazy, that an explanation for a phenomenon involving incredibly complex fields that have stumped generations of scientists can fit in a few sentences.
Second, because people using these kinds of arguments are not, in fact, biologists. As it happens, I know a fair few myself, and although it's not exactly the field of all of us, none are willing put this kind of argument forward. Not that it is necessarily wrong, but it speaks miles that people who would feel more qualified to give their opinion exercise much more caution than people who aren't.
Third, because many behaviors that don't make sense from an armchair evolutionary biologist's point of view are commonplace in nature. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_animals_displaying_homosexual_behavior https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_animals_displaying_hom...
There are many more such kinds of behaviors and we don't really understand where they come from or why they exist (if there's even a reason).
I don't want you to take it wrongly or read my post as dismissing what you said off-hand with arguments of authority etc. Nor should you take it personally, as there are many posts like yours and I simply chose to reply to the more detailed one. Again, it's not necessarily completely wrong, but probably simplistic to the point of being harmful. Just please be mindful of that the next time you're invoking the word 'evolutionary' in an argument to justify something.
- mallomarmeasle 8y agoHere is an insightful book on homosexual behavior in other animal species, to add to your wiki link: https://www.amazon.com/Biological-Exuberance-Homosexuality-Diversity-Stonewall/dp/031225377X https://www.amazon.com/Biological-Exuberance-Homosexuality-D...
- tome 8y agojlawson was very specifically giving a non-moralistic explanation.