3 ms·
This nice study goes into nicely thought out detail to compare speed of emulators, I recommend it. Urxvt is not so blazing fast at latency, and it manages great
by jgtrosh 8y ago
This nice study goes into nicely thought out detail to compare speed of emulators, I recommend it. Urxvt is not so blazing fast at latency, and it manages great scrolling speed by dropping content. (It's my current emulator of choice though !)
https://lwn.net/Articles/751763/ https://lwn.net/Articles/751763/
- rijoja 8y agoLovely I came here just for benchmarking of this kind, it's a shame that kitty isn't tested in the article though.
- flukus 8y agoDoes it drop it or simply not show it? Will scrolling back through history display the "dropped" content? If so I'm fine with that, it's annoying when you finally finish a task and pipe the results to a file just to find the bottleneck slowing you down was display refreshes.