4 ms·
I'm perplexed at the cost of these. I get that they're aimed at the corporate market, and this is probably spare change from their perspective, but does that me
by askvictor 8y ago
I'm perplexed at the cost of these. I get that they're aimed at the corporate market, and this is probably spare change from their perspective, but does that mean that the education, small-business and personal markets don't deserve the same level of security?
The device must cost a couple of dollars (at most) to manufacture, and I highly doubt the development and service costs add up anything close to the amount they're being sold for, so is the price simply what they can get away with?
Security-wise, how does this compare against a (free) phone-based 2FA app (be it TOTP or network based)?
I'm not against paying the real cost for a product/service, but this seems to be one where it doesn't add up.
- pvg 8y agoThere's two keys here and some adapters. It costs the same, or a bit less than buying your own keys individually. These counter phishing better than TOTP.
- askvictor 8y agoHow do hardware keys counter phishing better than TOTP?
- pvg 8y agoPhishing site has no access to the additional auth info. With regular 2FA mechanisms, you type that into a browser.
- askvictor 8y agoWith a security key, how does it get from the usb device to the browser? The token I used for my last work (I think it was a yubikey) appeared to the computer as a keyboard, and activating the 'button' on it simply sent a bunch of letters into an input field in a browser. This would be susceptible to phishing in the same way, no?
- LammyL 8y agoYour example would be valid if U2F simulated a keyboard, but it doesn’t. The U2F key is a non-keyboard USB-HID device. The browser has special code embedded to identify and communicate with U2F keys using low level operating system USB api calls. The authentication process is a challenge response mechanism where the site challenges and the key signs and responds to the request. The browser adds an additional piece of information to the challenge and embeds the actual URL (and tls session id if supported) and the server verifies this additional information. Phishing and mitm are prevented because the server is validating the actual URL of their own site when checking the signed response. The whole process is really cool when you get into the details and is very well designed for security.
- tptacek 8y ago"Hardware security key" has come to mean "U2F key". Older hardware keys (include Yubikeys in OTP mode) didn't do any better at preventing phishing than TOTP. But U2F keys do; they generate credentials that are cryptographically bound to site origins, and work out-of-band from the keyboard. They were designed specifically to combat phishing.
- pvg 8y agoOh! So the OG USB keys were OTP thingies that just did the typing for you? I had no idea.
- tptacek 8y agoYeah, but even before that there were things you might call a "security key" (but which most people called "hardware tokens") that just displayed a single TOTP-like code; if you talk to enterprise people about security keys, those SecurID tokens might be what they're thinking about.
- ecesena 8y agoCodes can be replied. Security keys cryptographically sign the hostname, so the credentials generated can't be used across different domains. This is a short edu video, I'd be curious if you have any feedback: https://twitter.com/_conorpp/status/1036751355346595840 https://twitter.com/_conorpp/status/1036751355346595840
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]