5 ms·
I get that this is a joke, but I also can't wait for AMP in its current form to die. Relatively lightweight pages = good… centralizing the web under Google's co
by binomialxenon 8y ago
I get that this is a joke, but I also can't wait for AMP in its current form to die. Relatively lightweight pages = good… centralizing the web under Google's control = bad.
- philliphaydon 8y agoYeah and the fact it doesn’t always work well. Trying to navigate and it isn’t working cos I need to break out of amp first.
- stochastic_monk 8y agoIt breaks most sites I use, unfairly promotes sites buying in toward the top, and I spend more data, time, and frustration than I would otherwise because I need to proceed to the actual page to get what I need. It’s a pure negative.
- 14 8y agoThis exactly...So frustrating clicking a web page and then inside the webpage parts of it are broken because you are actually at the amp site not the actual site. I haven't looked at how I can just avoid amp sites all together but if I had the choice I would.
- Angostura 8y agoWaiting for Apple to introduce a 'show originals rather than AMP' default into iOS Safari.
- millstone 8y agoThis feels inevitable, culminating in "Default Reader Mode." It makes one wonder why Google didn't bury some option to disable AMP to head this off.