3 ms·
>Second, fashion survives without patents because names matter. How does this not apply? How about AutoDesk, Apple, HP, Dell, Sony Vaio? All those names create
by lotusleaf1987 16y ago
>Second, fashion survives without patents because names matter.
How does this not apply? How about AutoDesk, Apple, HP, Dell, Sony Vaio? All those names create a different and unique mental image and perception. The name matters just as much in software as in fashion. And are you actually referring to the movie Primer as evidence?
- jemfinch 16y ago> How does this not apply? How about AutoDesk, Apple, HP, Dell, Sony Vaio? All those names create a different and unique mental image and perception. The name matters just as much in software as in fashion. And in the world I propose where software patents don't exist, it would matter even more. But the GGP didn't talk about banning software patents, he talked about banning all patents. If you must respond, please try to respond to the actual thrust of my argument. > And are you actually referring to the movie Primer as evidence? I made an allusion to it in a fictional example to illustrate a point. You sound like you're itching to argue for some reason.