5 ms·
Cloudkick (YC W09) hits 1,000,000 servers
- joshhart 16y agoHow is Cloudkick bootstrapped if they have 2.75 million in funding?
- joevandyk 16y agoReally large boots.
- benologist 16y ago*Alligator boots.
- die_sekte 16y agoWouldn't that be small boots and rocket powered bootstraps?
- joevandyk 16y agoAnyone use Cloudkick here? On EC2? Recommended?
- psadauskas 16y agoMaybe I'm too opinionated about the whole thing, but I have yet to find a cloud management solution that does things the way I want. Cloudkick, Rightscale, Chef, all seem to work ok, if you're willing to buy in to their preferred way of doing things. If you want to stray from that, though, its a lot of work, and brittle. I don't know that they're wrong, and I'm right, exactly, but it feels like they're all trying to paper over the features and drawbacks of cloud, and making it act more like traditional hardware that people are more familiar.
- ddispaltro 16y agoWe are trying to create a new way of doing things, right now we have a lot more on the monitoring side of coin; however, projects like cast are some of the next generation of tooling for CK. http://github.com/cloudkick/cast http://github.com/cloudkick/cast
- joevandyk 16y agoChef always seemed pretty flexible to me.
- michaelbuckbee 16y agoRecommended. We monitor about 30 servers with them (Rackspace Cloud). I consider them to be one more piece of the sysadmin replaced with a SASS solution. While you certainly could setup Nagios or whatever else for monitoring all of your machines, it's incredibly easy and far less maintenance to let CloudKick handle things.
- sanswork 16y agoMonitoring just under 50 servers with them on GoGrid. Just started actually and setup has been a breeze. We ran a nagios installation for a long time but the time and effort spent on running, updating and installing it just made it not worth the effort for us. We have it linked in with PagerDuty now as well.
- tim1 16y agoI do not think so. We use Nagios to monitor our EC2 servers (CPU, etc.) and then AlertFox ($199/month) for external transaction monitoring. That works well for our 25 EC2 instances (+ a few at the Planet)
- jbyers 16y agoTechCrunch: "Cloudkick Now Managing 1 Million Servers" Cloudkick Blog: "...we've just hit 1,000,000 servers registered all-time in Cloudkick." Those statements aren't even close to equivalent. The HN guidelines say it well: Please submit the original source. If a blog post reports on something they found on another site, submit the latter. https://www.cloudkick.com/blog/2010/oct/14/one-million-servers/ https://www.cloudkick.com/blog/2010/oct/14/one-million-serve...
- chrismiller 16y agoI'm currently using Cloudkick's 1 server developer plan. I would really love to use them to monitor all of our servers but their current plans don't work for us. We use lots of tiny instances and virtual machines. This means for us the cost of Cloudkick for each VM would be around the actual monthly cost of that VM. If you have are in a different position to myself and are using larger instances then I would recommend you give them a try!
- joevandyk 16y agoYeah, I'm in the same boat. :/
- jbarham 16y agoYeah, it looks a bit pricey considering the cheapest paid plan is $99/month for 6 servers.
- thaumaturgy 16y agoWe use Nagios on one of our Linodes to do our server monitoring. It's set up to do nearly constant monitoring; the last time we had a glitch, I received a text message about high CPU load before the graph at Linode had even updated to show the spike. That costs us $20/month, except we're doing it on a server that was already required for another service and had plenty of disk and CPU to spare, so ... really it costs us nothing, and gives us most of CloudKick's features, in our specific case. Given their pricing, I think I'd rather take that money each month and pay someone to contribute to Nagios instead. :-/
- vyrotek 16y agoWhere's the Windows Azure support?
- ddispaltro 16y agoDo they have an IaaS solution yet?
- vyrotek 16y agoI sure hope so because my company uses it :) I'm sure you were trying to point out that perhaps Azure doesn't meet your criteria for IaaS (yet). But, I think CloudKick offers many services that are possible to work with Azure right now. Full VM access is just around the corner and people will be shopping for CloudKick types services very soon. My company is ready to be your first Azure customer.
- ddispaltro 16y agoMaybe we can make that happen. Ill ping some folks, email me dan@cloudkick.com and Ill keep you updated.
- rmoriz 16y agodo they support hetzner.de?
- ddispaltro 16y agoNot at the moment, but you can always add machines from providers we don't support with https://support.cloudkick.com/Setting_up_Cloudkick_with_Physical_Servers https://support.cloudkick.com/Setting_up_Cloudkick_with_Phys...
- revorad 16y agoI did this on a small VPS server recently; worked like a charm.
- floodfx 16y agoGreat PR but probably misleading. For instance, we signed up initially and didn't find it too useful (although they've added a lot of features since then). We didn't delete our account until just now and when we logged in (again just now) we had 6k notifications from instance startup/shutdown. Never once did we "manage" any of these instances on cloudkick.
- shykes 16y agoTo be fair, Rightscale uses the same trick on their homepage.
- foobarbazetc 16y agoCloudkick looks nice and I have great respect for the tech team behind it, but it's seriously overpriced. I don't mind paying for Saas (and pay many thousands a month for all sorts of services), but this is ridiculous: https://www.cloudkick.com/pricing/ https://www.cloudkick.com/pricing/ I love how the page suggests that the $949/month plan is somehow the 'default'. :)
- deleted 16y ago[deleted]
- timnyc 16y agoI am sure if I get it. We use Nagios to monitor our EC2 servers (CPU, etc.) and then AlertFox for external transaction monitoring. What advantage would switching to CloudKick give us???