4 ms·
Seems to be the last 52 esr for Vista as well as XP. Is it a bit sneaky to just announce the older OS? When I click on the download for firefox 62 on this old
by strainer 8y ago
Seems to be the last 52 esr for Vista as well as XP. Is it a bit sneaky to just announce the older OS?
When I click on the download for firefox 62 on this old Vista laptop, I just get sent the install file 52.9.0 esr with no warning or explanation.
52 works nice for now for you know, old dog tricks.
- slededit 8y agoVista's market share is a rounding error - it never overtook XP. Today XP adoption is still almost 5x higher. They could have mentioned it, but XP support is by far what people care about.
- AdmiralAsshat 8y agoVista felt incredibly half-baked, and no one I know kept it once Windows 7 became an option.
- olliej 8y agoMy understanding is basically vista was a huge step forward in the security and stability of the OS, but those changes made traditional backwards compat harder to maintain (eg old software was more likely to break), and the driver model changes made the entire windows driver system waaaaymore secure, at the cost of requiring either substantial rewrites (especially for the gpu drivers) or slow compat layers. After a couple of years drivers etc had settled down so performance horrors had been fixed, and more software was actually doing the right thing, but by then win7 was out. Because of the problems with it people (incl oems) didn’t sell it :-/
- zahrc 8y ago> Vista felt incredibly half-baked, and no one I know kept it once Windows 7 became an option. The family of my two best friends (which is like a family for myself too) is still using vista. It's fascinating how it felt like a giant beta test for win7
- strainer 8y agoBy a factor of 4 or 5 - thats 20% of people affected. Its not a short announcement, plenty of room to mention Vista.