3 ms·
>>>According to Law.com, Webvention acquired the property from the great patent gobbler itself, Intellectual Ventures<<< Why do I have this funny feeling that
by todayiamme 16y ago
>>>According to Law.com, Webvention acquired the property from the great patent gobbler itself, Intellectual Ventures<<<
Why do I have this funny feeling that this is a front for intellectual ventures and lots of people are going to bought off?
- Devilboy 16y agoWouldn't be the first http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100217/1853298215.shtml http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100217/1853298215.shtml
- sireat 16y agoIndeed, why would Intellectual Ventures sell some of its patents instead of doing the usual, that is using fronts to sue people. In fact, this case seems suspicously similar to earlier case Intellectual Ventures shell vs. Kodak http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100310/0302518496.shtml http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100310/0302518496.shtml This way IV can continue claiming that they never sued anyone(themselves).